Reticulated python vs Giraffe
Reticulated python (6.95 m) is 1.26× the size of giraffe (5.5 m).
Giraffe is 79% of the height of reticulated python. The gap between them is 1.45 m (4.76 ft).
The comparison in numbers
| Thing | Size | In feet | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reticulated python | 6.95 m | 22.8 ft | length |
| Giraffe | 5.5 m | 18 ft | height |
What the scale shows
Reticulated python (6.95 m) is 1.26× the size of giraffe (5.5 m). The gap between them is 1.45 m (4.76 ft). Both are animals, so the figures describe the same kind of thing.
Draw both on one baseline and the smaller one fills 79% of the frame while the larger one runs to the top. The two are close enough that the difference is easy to see side by side.
Read the rest — 8 more sections
What each figure means
The figure for reticulated python is its length (the longest reliably recorded). The figure for giraffe is its height (the tallest males).
Crossing them
Walking pace is 1.4 m/s, so crossing reticulated python's 6.95 m takes 5 seconds and giraffe's 5.5 m takes 3.9 seconds.
In people: reticulated python is 4.1 adults of 1.7 m tall, giraffe is 3.24. By size reticulated python is 8th of the 23 animals on this site and giraffe is 9th, so 1 place separates them in the ranking.
How to read these two figures
Before trusting any comparison, check what each number measures. The reticulated python is given as a length, the longest reliably recorded. The giraffe is given as a height, the tallest males. One is a length and the other is a height, so the drawing stands them side by side by convention: everything is stood upright on a single baseline so one scale can hold. That is a fair way to compare overall extent, not a claim that the two are oriented the same way in real life.
Animal sizes vary from one individual to the next, so each figure says which individual or average it describes. Heights are taken at the shoulder or standing; lengths run nose to tail tip unless stated.
Where the pair sits among all the sizes here
Across all 86 things on this site, the reticulated python is number 70 from the top and the giraffe is number 71. No other item falls between them, so in this collection they are direct neighbours.
Because the collection spans 13 mm up to 1,392,700 km, a ratio of 107,130,769,231× from smallest to largest, the position of a pair says a lot: both sit in the lower third of the list.
What the length ratio hides
A length ratio of 1.26× is easy to picture, but area and volume grow faster than length. If two objects had exactly the same shape, the reticulated python would have about 1.6× the surface or footprint of the giraffe, and about 2.02× the volume. For animals volume tracks weight, which is why a long animal is far heavier than its length suggests, and why a small animal cannot simply be a scaled-down copy of a large one.
The drawing above shows length only. The giraffe is drawn 79% as tall as the reticulated python, but the equivalent share of footprint would be only 62.6%, which is why the smaller one looks even slighter than the numbers alone suggest.
Time to cross each one
A sprinter holding about 10 m/s covers the reticulated python in 695 milliseconds and the giraffe in 550 milliseconds. Sound, at about 343 m/s in air, takes 20 milliseconds for the larger and 16 milliseconds for the smaller. A jet cruising at 900 km/h needs 28 milliseconds and 22 milliseconds.
These times assume a straight line and constant speed, which no real crossing has, but they turn a number in metres into something the body understands. At any fixed speed the travel times keep the same 1.26× ratio as the sizes.
The same figures in other units
The reticulated python measures 6.95 m, which is 22.8 ft or 7.6 yards. The giraffe measures 5.5 m, which is 18 ft.
The difference between them is 1.45 m (4.76 ft). In metres the smaller one is 5.5 against 6.95, so the 1.26× ratio holds in every unit; only the numbers on the ruler change.
Questions people ask about this pair
Which is bigger, the reticulated python or the giraffe?
The reticulated python is bigger. At 6.95 m it is 1.26× the size of the giraffe, which is 5.5 m.
How many times does the giraffe fit along the reticulated python?
Less than twice: the giraffe is 79% of the size of the reticulated python, so one fits with 1.45 m to spare.
Are the two figures measured the same way?
No. The reticulated python is a length (the longest reliably recorded) and the giraffe is a height (the tallest males), so read the comparison as overall extent.
How does the gap look in people?
Taking an adult of 1.7 m, the reticulated python is about 4.1 people tall and the giraffe is about 3.24. The gap of 1.45 m is 0.9 people.
Where do the numbers come from?
Each item has its own page that names the measurement and links to the Wikipedia article it was taken from. Some figures are rounded, and animals vary from one individual to the next, so treat them as representative values rather than records for every case.
How the sizes are taken. Each figure says what it measures — height, length, diameter or elevation — and for which individual or convention. Everything is drawn standing upright on one baseline so a single scale holds, including things that are long rather than tall. Values come from the linked Wikipedia article for each item.