Skip to content
Size vs

Ostrich vs Moose

Ostrich (2.5 m) is 1.19× the size of moose (2.1 m).

Ostrich 2.5 m next to moose 2.1 mOstrich is 2.5 m and moose is 2.1 m, drawn on one baseline at the same scale.
Ostrich 2.5 m next to moose 2.1 mOstrich is 2.5 m and moose is 2.1 m, drawn on one baseline at the same scale.

Moose is 84% of the height of ostrich. The gap between them is 40 cm (1.31 ft).

The comparison in numbers

Ostrich and Moose at a glance
ThingSizeIn feetMeasured as
Ostrich2.5 m8.2 ftheight
Moose2.1 m6.89 ftshoulder height

What the scale shows

Ostrich (2.5 m) is 1.19× the size of moose (2.1 m). The gap between them is 40 cm (1.31 ft). Both are animals, so the figures describe the same kind of thing.

Draw both on one baseline and the smaller one fills 84% of the frame while the larger one runs to the top. The two are close enough that the difference is easy to see side by side.

Read the rest — 8 more sections

What each figure means

The figure for ostrich is its height (an adult male (2.1–2.8 m)). The figure for moose is its shoulder height (a large bull).

Crossing them

Walking pace is 1.4 m/s, so crossing ostrich's 2.5 m takes 1.8 seconds and moose's 2.1 m takes 1.5 seconds.

In people: ostrich is 1.5 adults of 1.7 m tall, moose is 1.24. By size ostrich is 15th of the 23 animals on this site and moose is 16th, so 1 place separates them in the ranking.

How to read these two figures

Before trusting any comparison, check what each number measures. The ostrich is given as a height, an adult male (2.1–2.8 m). The moose is given as a shoulder height, a large bull. One is a height and the other is a shoulder height, so the drawing stands them side by side by convention: everything is stood upright on a single baseline so one scale can hold. That is a fair way to compare overall extent, not a claim that the two are oriented the same way in real life.

Animal sizes vary from one individual to the next, so each figure says which individual or average it describes. Heights are taken at the shoulder or standing; lengths run nose to tail tip unless stated.

Where the pair sits among all the sizes here

Across all 86 things on this site, the ostrich is number 78 from the top and the moose is number 79. No other item falls between them, so in this collection they are direct neighbours.

Because the collection spans 13 mm up to 1,392,700 km, a ratio of 107,130,769,231× from smallest to largest, the position of a pair says a lot: both sit in the lower third of the list.

What the length ratio hides

A length ratio of 1.19× is easy to picture, but area and volume grow faster than length. If two objects had exactly the same shape, the ostrich would have about 1.42× the surface or footprint of the moose, and about 1.69× the volume. For animals volume tracks weight, which is why a long animal is far heavier than its length suggests, and why a small animal cannot simply be a scaled-down copy of a large one.

The drawing above shows length only. The moose is drawn 84% as tall as the ostrich, but the equivalent share of footprint would be only 70.6%, which is why the smaller one looks even slighter than the numbers alone suggest.

Time to cross each one

A sprinter holding about 10 m/s covers the ostrich in 250 milliseconds and the moose in 210 milliseconds. Sound, at about 343 m/s in air, takes 7 milliseconds for the larger and 6 milliseconds for the smaller. A jet cruising at 900 km/h needs 10 milliseconds and 8 milliseconds.

These times assume a straight line and constant speed, which no real crossing has, but they turn a number in metres into something the body understands. At any fixed speed the travel times keep the same 1.19× ratio as the sizes.

The same figures in other units

The ostrich measures 2.5 m, which is 8.2 ft or 2.7 yards. The moose measures 2.1 m, which is 6.89 ft.

The difference between them is 40 cm (1.31 ft). In metres the smaller one is 2.1 against 2.5, so the 1.19× ratio holds in every unit; only the numbers on the ruler change.

Questions people ask about this pair

Which is bigger, the ostrich or the moose?

The ostrich is bigger. At 2.5 m it is 1.19× the size of the moose, which is 2.1 m.

How many times does the moose fit along the ostrich?

Less than twice: the moose is 84% of the size of the ostrich, so one fits with 40 cm to spare.

Are the two figures measured the same way?

No. The ostrich is a height (an adult male (2.1–2.8 m)) and the moose is a shoulder height (a large bull), so read the comparison as overall extent.

How does the gap look in people?

Taking an adult of 1.7 m, the ostrich is about 1.5 people tall and the moose is about 1.24. The gap of 40 cm is 0.2 people.

Where do the numbers come from?

Each item has its own page that names the measurement and links to the Wikipedia article it was taken from. Some figures are rounded, and animals vary from one individual to the next, so treat them as representative values rather than records for every case.

How the sizes are taken. Each figure says what it measures — height, length, diameter or elevation — and for which individual or convention. Everything is drawn standing upright on one baseline so a single scale holds, including things that are long rather than tall. Values come from the linked Wikipedia article for each item.

Open this pair in the comparer and change either side